Climategate Emails
you are here : index of content
-
climate change - climatgate emails
Unknown abreviation or concept ? consult our environmental dictionary !
Critics cite this as evidence that data was manipulated to mask the fact that global temperatures are falling. Prof Jones claims the meaning of "trick" has been misinterpreted. In fact it hided the decline in temperature as indicated by the proxy measures for temperature: tree ring data, which fell in the last decennia whereas the actual temerature measurement showed a rise in temperature. This discrepancy had to be hidden as it implied that the proxy data were useless and an unreliable source to estimate historic temperatures from 1080-1880 as was shown in Michael mann et al's infamous hockystick graph. See this video for a clear explanation.
The IPCC is the UN body charged with monitoring climate change. The scientists did not want it to consider studies that challenge the view that global warming is genuine and man-made.
From: Kevin Trenberth (US National Center for Atmospheric Research). To: Michael Mann. Oct 12, 2009
"The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't... Our observing system is inadequate"
Prof Trenberth appears to accept a key argument of global warming sceptics - that there is no evidence temperatures have increased over the past 10 years.
From: Phil Jones. To: Many. March 11, 2003
“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”
Prof Jones appears to be lobbying for the dismissal of the editor of Climate Research, a scientific journal that published papers downplaying climate change.
This website is an activity of Van der Molen Financial Services,
Copyright 2010 f(f): Dr. Hugo H. van der Molen (editor)
Mail us your comments !